Transgender

Here’s something most of us don’t think about every day: The transgendered. Which is why I was pleased to see a story on CNN.com today profiling some of them.

I once knew a guy on the internet. Him and his wife, actually. They were minor public figures in a small techie circle I hung out in. I even met them in person once. Nice folks.

Not long after that the guy (I’ll call him Sam) announced publicly that he’d rather be called Samantha. With the support of his wife, he was coming out as a transgendered individual: Born looking like a man on the outside, feeling 100% female on the inside.

I said bravo to the entire family. Bravo also to the brave people profiled on that CNN piece.

CNN video

I think I’ve ranted about this before, but I hate the way CNN does video on their web site. It’s not even that they often show a commercial before the promised video (although it is annoying). The real problem is what happens after you’ve watched what you came for.

What happens is the video stops and then superimposed on the last frame is a countdown: 5, 4, 3, 2… A countdown to what? The “next” video CNN wants to show me, of course. At some level they must recognize that I may not want to see that next video, else why give me a countdown warning? And indeed the real effect of the count down is to make me leave the CNN web site at once before I can be assaulted by the ad preceding the next video clip. Often I just close the window entirely rather than navigating away with a click.

So that’s the problem. What they’re doing at the end of the video causes me to leave their site post haste. How counterproductive is that?

Video news on the web

If you read the headlines at CNN.com under “Latest News,” you might have noticed that some headlines have a little video camera icon next to them.  (Some also seem to have a t-shirt icon next to them, too, but I have no idea what that’s about.)  That video camera icon indicates that if you click on that headline you’ll be taken to a page with a video-based as opposed to a text-based news story.  Simple enough.

Here’s the thing, though.  I’m annoyed by it.  I’m actually less likely to click on that headline if I see that video  icon, and I’ve been trying to reason out why.

Some news orgs make you watch a commercial before getting to the story.  That’s annoying.  But even if they don’t, there’s other things that bug me.  Text is faster, for one thing.  I can scan the first two paragraphs in about five seconds and determine if it’s worth continuing or not.  With video, it hasn’t even started playing in five seconds.  Also, there isn’t any real way to “skim” a video report.

So I don’t click on the stories with the little video camera icon next to them very often.  No biggie.  But I’m imagining some CNN.com executive somewhere saying “we need to put more video on the site!”  I have no idea if that’s true or not, but I can tell you this: the way they’re doing it now isn’t working for me.

McCain and Obama: Tax policy proposals compared

Democrats are going to raise your taxes, blah, blah, blah. Let’s have a serious look at what the candidates are really proposing. Here’s a link to an informative graphic. Below is CNNs discussion of a non-partisan report on the candidate’s plans. Tell me honesty: Which policy do you prefer?

So. Who are you personally going to get the best tax deal from? Whose policy do you figure is more responsible with regard to the record-setting deficit spending of the Bush administration?

I expect i’ll hear from the Libertarian “I want to shrink the size of government to 1842 levels” crowd who will knee-jerk favor McCain’s plan simply because it lowers taxes for everyone, including millionaires. But for the rest of us–those of us who aren’t advocating radical changes in the scope of the federal government–who would honestly support the McCain plan over the Obama plan?

Bullying

“You will encounter situations where parents will tell their kids, ‘If you are hit, I want you to hit back.’”

Experts point out it is important for parents to keep emotions in check and to not encourage a child to hit back or retaliate.

And apparently you will encounter “experts” who advise kids to be punching bags for bullies.

Look, I’m all for kids going to their parents with this stuff. Obviously. And I’m all for parents talking to school authorities. I’m all for calling up the parents of the kid (something else that the so-called experts warn against).

But I’m also for striking back when you are struck. I went to grade school in Los Angeles. I was skinny, introverted, and, truth be told, kind of funny looking. Unsurprisingly, then, there were sometimes bullies. What I remember most about these encounters is that the only thing that ever helped was bloodying the nose of my antagonist.

Bullies don’t like fights, you see. They like pushing people around. Fighting is work, and–win or lose–fighting can be painful.

I carried on with this strategy well into middle school. Sometimes it got me in trouble. Sometimes it got me hurt. But I never, ever had to suffer endless torment at the hands of some smirking bully.

Kids, if a schoolmate hits you and there’s no one around to help, hit back.

“You… yeah, you. Sick of some jerk shoving your head down the toilet? Well, you know what? Maybe… you should lift some weights, or uh, take a karate lesson and the next time he tries to do it, you kick him in the balls.” – Donnie Darko

Democratic Debate

Winner:

“I think I will be the most Democrat who is most effective against a John McCain–or any other Republican, because [...] I will offer a clear contrast as somebody who never supported this war, thought it was a bad idea. I don’t want to just end the war, but I want to end the mind-set that got us into war in the first place. That’s the kind of leadership I intend to provide as president of the United states.” – Sen. Barack Obama

Loser:

“So what I hear you saying –and correct me if I’m wrong–is that you were naive in trusting president Bush?” – CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer to Sen. Hillary Clinton