<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Picture this</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448</link>
	<description>technologist, musician and teacher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobbies » technologist, musician and teacher</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-22480</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobbies » technologist, musician and teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 02:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-22480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] one of those people who just can&#8217;t thrive without a creative outlet of some kind. For many years that outlet was photography, but no more. I&#8217;ve given it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one of those people who just can&#8217;t thrive without a creative outlet of some kind. For many years that outlet was photography, but no more. I&#8217;ve given it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12557</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go with Nikon then.  I did mostly serendipitously.  But now that I&#039;m here, I have no regrets at all.

Also, I like stabilization.  I just can&#039;t afford it on the fast-aperture lenses I want!  And when forced to choose between the two I have so far gone fast aperture.

The lens I use the most is probably my 18-50mm f/2.8 Sigma.  It&#039;s good in low light and able to take group shots and even landscape and architecture.  It&#039;s the one I use to shoot groups of 2-20 people when I work a wedding reception.  The one I &lt;i&gt;enjoy&lt;/i&gt; the most is my 85mm f/1.8, though.  It&#039;s like magic for a portrait and is fantastic in indoor light.  I also have a 50-150mm f/2.8 Sigma for wedding ceremonies where I can&#039;t get too close.  The best bargain in Nikon lenses has to be their 5omm f/1.8.  For $125 you get a super bright, super sharp lens that&#039;s good for portraits or 2-3 people.  Just an all around handy lens that gives a high quality image.  You have to zoom with your feet but most people choose to live with that handicap when they see the results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go with Nikon then.  I did mostly serendipitously.  But now that I&#8217;m here, I have no regrets at all.</p>
<p>Also, I like stabilization.  I just can&#8217;t afford it on the fast-aperture lenses I want!  And when forced to choose between the two I have so far gone fast aperture.</p>
<p>The lens I use the most is probably my 18-50mm f/2.8 Sigma.  It&#8217;s good in low light and able to take group shots and even landscape and architecture.  It&#8217;s the one I use to shoot groups of 2-20 people when I work a wedding reception.  The one I <i>enjoy</i> the most is my 85mm f/1.8, though.  It&#8217;s like magic for a portrait and is fantastic in indoor light.  I also have a 50-150mm f/2.8 Sigma for wedding ceremonies where I can&#8217;t get too close.  The best bargain in Nikon lenses has to be their 5omm f/1.8.  For $125 you get a super bright, super sharp lens that&#8217;s good for portraits or 2-3 people.  Just an all around handy lens that gives a high quality image.  You have to zoom with your feet but most people choose to live with that handicap when they see the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locke</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12556</link>
		<dc:creator>Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been partial to Nikon in part because that&#039;s what I used years ago when I had a 35mm film camera &amp; the time to play with it. Being more tech geek, I was amazed at how much thought &amp; foresight they put in to maintaining compatibility between lenses &amp; bodies so that pulled me that direction as well. But I suppose I should give Canon a look as well.

Having read the second part of your Lifehacker piece, I do have an idea what you&#039;re talking about as far as aperture - though I hadn&#039;t considered how it varied between lenses. Actually as far as lenses, all I know is that lens choice is very important and that comparing some simple tests with VR/stabilization on and off, I pretty well convinced I want it. 

As far as what pictures I want to take - for the most part, the world revolves around my kids. Though I do find myself enjoying birdwatching at the backyard feeder more than I ever thought &amp; would like to get shots of them as well. Generally all of the point &amp; click digital cameras I&#039;ve used have taken fine pictures outside in decent light (though looking forward to being able to do depth of field). The indoor shots - even with decent light - have been _really_ disappointing with our current Cybershot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been partial to Nikon in part because that&#8217;s what I used years ago when I had a 35mm film camera &amp; the time to play with it. Being more tech geek, I was amazed at how much thought &amp; foresight they put in to maintaining compatibility between lenses &amp; bodies so that pulled me that direction as well. But I suppose I should give Canon a look as well.</p>
<p>Having read the second part of your Lifehacker piece, I do have an idea what you&#8217;re talking about as far as aperture &#8211; though I hadn&#8217;t considered how it varied between lenses. Actually as far as lenses, all I know is that lens choice is very important and that comparing some simple tests with VR/stabilization on and off, I pretty well convinced I want it. </p>
<p>As far as what pictures I want to take &#8211; for the most part, the world revolves around my kids. Though I do find myself enjoying birdwatching at the backyard feeder more than I ever thought &amp; would like to get shots of them as well. Generally all of the point &amp; click digital cameras I&#8217;ve used have taken fine pictures outside in decent light (though looking forward to being able to do depth of field). The indoor shots &#8211; even with decent light &#8211; have been _really_ disappointing with our current Cybershot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12555</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The things I care about in a camera body are 1) low noise in poorly lighted shots and 2) dedicated buttons for functions instead of having to dig around in menus.  After that, I rely on my lenses and my know-how.  

And don&#039;t be limited to one brand.  Go Nikon or Canon, for sure.  But choose between them by a) whatever you can get a deal on and b) if you have a friend who has that brand of gear you can borrow.

Lenses are key.  The &quot;kit lens&quot; that comes with the camera is often not very good at anything in particular.  I&#039;m partial to lenses that have a fast aperture.  Even my zoom lenses have a constant f/2.8.  (If you have no idea what I&#039;m talking about I can explain it!)

Getting an inexpensive Nikon body and a 50mm f/1.8 will take you a long way.  I shot my entire trip to Chicago just the other day with a Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 and the other photogs were jealous of the results, especially in indoor lighting situations.  Plus it&#039;s great for portraits.

A lot can depend on what kind of pictures you want to take.  What are you interested in?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The things I care about in a camera body are 1) low noise in poorly lighted shots and 2) dedicated buttons for functions instead of having to dig around in menus.  After that, I rely on my lenses and my know-how.  </p>
<p>And don&#8217;t be limited to one brand.  Go Nikon or Canon, for sure.  But choose between them by a) whatever you can get a deal on and b) if you have a friend who has that brand of gear you can borrow.</p>
<p>Lenses are key.  The &#8220;kit lens&#8221; that comes with the camera is often not very good at anything in particular.  I&#8217;m partial to lenses that have a fast aperture.  Even my zoom lenses have a constant f/2.8.  (If you have no idea what I&#8217;m talking about I can explain it!)</p>
<p>Getting an inexpensive Nikon body and a 50mm f/1.8 will take you a long way.  I shot my entire trip to Chicago just the other day with a Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 and the other photogs were jealous of the results, especially in indoor lighting situations.  Plus it&#8217;s great for portraits.</p>
<p>A lot can depend on what kind of pictures you want to take.  What are you interested in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locke</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12554</link>
		<dc:creator>Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well my head&#039;s spinning a bit from info overload actually. Initially I was just thinking of getting started with a D3000 - but then read some opinions that it&#039;s foolish to not bump up to the D5000 to get a much better sensor, plus video (which is only a minor factor for me). The other thing is that it sounds like the ADR in the 3000 can really add significant lag and with a 5 frame buffer, it&#039;s not difficult to get stuck waiting. One of the reasons for moving up from point &amp; click is that we want to get past the lag times. The 5000 has more options with ADR which I&#039;d hope would help. I&#039;ve also spent a lot of time at Ken Rockwell&#039;s site and he&#039;s so glowing about the D40 but they&#039;re not really available new anymore &amp; I&#039;m not comfortable going used (unless it was someone I trusted) since I wouldn&#039;t be able to really tell if everything is working correctly right away. Oh and not to mention, I&#039;m seeing both the D3000 &amp; 5000 out of stock at some places - which makes me wonder if it&#039;s just a supply hiccup or of there&#039;s something more going on, like maybe a product refresh.

Anyway, ramble over. Any suggestions or recommendations?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well my head&#8217;s spinning a bit from info overload actually. Initially I was just thinking of getting started with a D3000 &#8211; but then read some opinions that it&#8217;s foolish to not bump up to the D5000 to get a much better sensor, plus video (which is only a minor factor for me). The other thing is that it sounds like the ADR in the 3000 can really add significant lag and with a 5 frame buffer, it&#8217;s not difficult to get stuck waiting. One of the reasons for moving up from point &amp; click is that we want to get past the lag times. The 5000 has more options with ADR which I&#8217;d hope would help. I&#8217;ve also spent a lot of time at Ken Rockwell&#8217;s site and he&#8217;s so glowing about the D40 but they&#8217;re not really available new anymore &amp; I&#8217;m not comfortable going used (unless it was someone I trusted) since I wouldn&#8217;t be able to really tell if everything is working correctly right away. Oh and not to mention, I&#8217;m seeing both the D3000 &amp; 5000 out of stock at some places &#8211; which makes me wonder if it&#8217;s just a supply hiccup or of there&#8217;s something more going on, like maybe a product refresh.</p>
<p>Anyway, ramble over. Any suggestions or recommendations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12552</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a small internet!  So what are you thinking about buying?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a small internet!  So what are you thinking about buying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locke</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12551</link>
		<dc:creator>Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny how things work. I&#039;ve gone back &amp; forth with you a few times on other blogs (and most often disagree, but consider and appreciate your take on things). At some point, I clicked on the link that brought me here. Now to the amusing part - I also happen to be a Lifehacker reader &amp; am looking to purchase my first DSLR. While doing a little reading there, I came across your articles there, which...brought me back here. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how things work. I&#8217;ve gone back &amp; forth with you a few times on other blogs (and most often disagree, but consider and appreciate your take on things). At some point, I clicked on the link that brought me here. Now to the amusing part &#8211; I also happen to be a Lifehacker reader &amp; am looking to purchase my first DSLR. While doing a little reading there, I came across your articles there, which&#8230;brought me back here. <img src='http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12526</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 03:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early on I thought I needed a really long neck strap so I could wear my camera bandolier-style across my chest.  This turned out to be a really silly idea on my part.  Eventually I learned how to wear the strap on my right shoulder such that the lens pointed at my back instead of sticking out dangerously.  I find the stock strap of a DSLR is long enough for this if you take out all the slack.

Be careful about straps, though.  Just a week ago I had one come off unexpectedly.  Luckily I didn&#039;t have $2,000 worth of gear go clattering to the floor.  I&#039;d put on a new strap a couple of weeks earlier and I either didn&#039;t put it on quite right or it just sucks.

Also, I have three camera bags right now.  By far my favorite one is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Domke-700-30B-Super-Compact-Black/dp/B00009R886&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Domke Supercompact&lt;/a&gt;.  I found one for like $85, though.  It&#039;s a terrific bag for one camera and an extra lens and some batteries and flash.  A good bag to shoot out of.  I also have two &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Lowepro-Slingshot-Weather-Backpack-Black/dp/B000B9O83A&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lowepro Slinshots&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early on I thought I needed a really long neck strap so I could wear my camera bandolier-style across my chest.  This turned out to be a really silly idea on my part.  Eventually I learned how to wear the strap on my right shoulder such that the lens pointed at my back instead of sticking out dangerously.  I find the stock strap of a DSLR is long enough for this if you take out all the slack.</p>
<p>Be careful about straps, though.  Just a week ago I had one come off unexpectedly.  Luckily I didn&#8217;t have $2,000 worth of gear go clattering to the floor.  I&#8217;d put on a new strap a couple of weeks earlier and I either didn&#8217;t put it on quite right or it just sucks.</p>
<p>Also, I have three camera bags right now.  By far my favorite one is the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Domke-700-30B-Super-Compact-Black/dp/B00009R886" rel="nofollow">Domke Supercompact</a>.  I found one for like $85, though.  It&#8217;s a terrific bag for one camera and an extra lens and some batteries and flash.  A good bag to shoot out of.  I also have two <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lowepro-Slingshot-Weather-Backpack-Black/dp/B000B9O83A" rel="nofollow">Lowepro Slinshots</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carole Burns</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12525</link>
		<dc:creator>Carole Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article Scott - it is good knowing that I am on the right track - just the love of photography can take you a long way.  Although I prefer to work weddings from the video side, I really enjoy taking pictures of nature and events.  I plan on going pretty much down the same path - working my D40 to the bone until I feel I am ready to move ahead.  Right now I need to get better and remembering to grab my camera when I leave the house.  I am thinking that a new case and longer strap will help with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Scott &#8211; it is good knowing that I am on the right track &#8211; just the love of photography can take you a long way.  Although I prefer to work weddings from the video side, I really enjoy taking pictures of nature and events.  I plan on going pretty much down the same path &#8211; working my D40 to the bone until I feel I am ready to move ahead.  Right now I need to get better and remembering to grab my camera when I leave the house.  I am thinking that a new case and longer strap will help with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leisureguy</title>
		<link>http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12520</link>
		<dc:creator>Leisureguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfeldstein.net/blog/?p=3448#comment-12520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very cool. Thanks for posting that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool. Thanks for posting that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
